[+++] Those owning more than 5 house slots will be charged when offline

[Roxen]

 

[Tahar]

 

[Aeoutras]

Just like Wish said,
 stop bringing constant updates to house issues anymore, Because we don't want to be ONLINE for a reason, And these updates bring other issues about it like you have to be charged to keep again the 5 houses or 10 - 20, the problem was enough that we had to be charged for being online then changed to offline???. What is your purpose and the problems with it? A system that has been added before is now changed even more?. I don't see any benefit in having to pay all the fees charged. There is no value in buying a house now, you should know that most house buyers have paid a huge amount of money to own it     Negative 

[Terry]

It's not only about five houses because DL3 players can own 10 houses in total so I prefer if players offline even they are not DL3 they can be charged if they have 10 houses+ not 5 houses+ that's a offline system it gonna cost a fortune let's be logical but I upvote 

[DarkMoris]

It's not only about five houses because DL3 players can own 10 houses in total so I prefer if players offline even they are not DL3 they can be charged if they have 10 houses+ not 5 houses+ that's a offline system it gonna cost a fortune let's be logical but I upvote 

 

[Cime]

 

[Metall]

It's not only about five houses because DL3 players can own 10 houses in total so I prefer if players offline even they are not DL3 they can be charged if they have 10 houses+ not 5 houses+ that's a offline system it gonna cost a fortune let's be logical but I upvote 

Yes what he means is those who own more than 5 house slots should be charged when offline. So for DL3 that is still 5 + 5.

[CalaBaSaS]

nice idea

[BornMoris]

 

[CoPe.]

 

[redox]

 

[Thug]

I assumed that this function already existed because a lot of players were exploiting it by going offline for 13 days, as Driver indicated, and then joining before the 14-day mark. I hope Arran would take that advice and put an end to the misuse from individuals who are inactive yet have an uncountable number of houses. 

That was my reply on the previous topic and I still have the same opinion, I am positive. 

[ash45]

 

[HoRiZoN2053]

 

[iMazen]

I see that one person owns a lot of houses  so I think its good idea