[+++] Differences Of Players And AI In Trade F7 (Iron)

[Violet]

After reviewing your suggestion, we obtained the following results:

26 positive votes.
1 negative votes.

Marked as High priority.

[-Alone-]

I Agree, Good Idea

[DarkShad0w]

Looks like an idea that can change our marketing system to better , no wonder why it's marked as high priority , positive

[Bankai]

I like the explanation of it and yea as it says that this might bring back civ life again. so I vote positive .

[Connor#]

I liked the idea, it seems useful to make things fairer. Positive

[Ster]

Yes

[NewPunk]

This make sense I'm okay with this. It must be different from the AI and Players in trading F7 this can make the system fair and balance enough in pricing. 

[Pollux]

Well I understand where you're coming from, it might not be the best deal. However I do not think there should be a decrease in the AI Trader prices, inflation has become a serious problem in CIT and whatever costed you X a year ago now costs at least 1.5X, the average player nowadays has at least $100,000,000 in their bank account and people are richer than ever.
The AI Trader system is a great way to deposit CIT players' money, with that, reduce inflation slowly.
I don't support it.

[Arran]

Wednesday 13th March 2024
- Increased the price that AI Trader buys Iron at from $50 to $55. (Arran + Bon)

I think this idea is stupid and will make the problem worse because now you're just going to have to buy Iron for $55 instead of $50. No player is going to start selling Iron for $50 just because AI Trader no longer competes. They could have just sold it at $49 if they wanted to compete. You just made the problem worse and I can't be bothered denying it and going against the players, if they want to shoot themselves in the foot... Go ahead.