The ingame vote would take place in different sides (law, civ, crim) due to the fact that we all aren't representing the exact same side.
My argument: it takes too much time, having to bother others, the top 5 councillors wont always be ingame and wont always have time.
We are representing the community, not a side.
Different councillors are representing different sides: we have a very experienced LV player who has become a councillor. Wouldn't it make sense for him to work on LV, and try and improve it, or should someone like me who has spent most of him time in law side do it?As a councillor I do not represent sides like civilian, criminal or LV because that is not my field of experience. You see, it wouldn't make sense for me to start changing a specific side I have barely experienced.
This is what happens when I dont delete your "usual" quotes. Just check topic and notice how it has full of negativity, hate and toxic posts (except some funny ones. Respect to you). You only spreat anger against PAM and Staff team. I feel so sorry that you've failed in life.
To be honest theres never more than 4 councillors online so I doubt this would ever be spammed. I think its useless anyway because only 10 people ever respond to it...
We are here to work as a team in order to find solutions for a better CIT, and the current system of allowing top 5 to start a vote isn't right. We are all councilors, and we should all have the same access.