I think this feature would be a disadvantage cops, this suggestion would be fear for everyone if instead of freezing the cops, not letting em shoot for 5 seconds would be the deal for everyone...but freezing cops in an event full of criminals? I'm going with Negative for now
This shows the level of intelligence and unawareness this community has progressed to. If you despawn your jetpack near a criminal, you automatically get frozen for 5 secs. If you use a jetpack in an AR, you lose health and eventually die in a second's notice. If however, this for some reason is not working, then it's a bug that you have to report on the QA board.
I thought it was a bug, and it was actually reported by me but the QAMs considered it not a bug and it was supposed to be like that.
This post looks funny to me as a cop where a criminal can already lurk up behind at any time not only in ARs (which is very common btw)
I wonder when you will consider shooting a criminal an unfair advantage too... Not to mention you already get frozen for landing near a wanted player. Pretty unnecessary suggestion, I vote negative.
Its mostly a suicidal attack, So if the criminals at the AR can't handle one cop rushing between their lines using a jeptack then its mostly their problems, I clearly can't see where is the disadvantage, Most of ARs got like two doors and its easy to take down one cop coming all the way using jetpack, in addition of that I didn't like the term of "cop can come from behind the criminal", When criminals are cracking ARs they literally leave the AR and kill the cops from back and there is no way to stop such thing. So I'm not supporting this idea.
Do that suicidal attack with a car or a heli or any vehicle you got, but not jetpack, and no it's not the same, it takes time to leave the vehicle which lets criminals kill the cop easier, criminals "can't handle on cop rushing" because HE IS ABUSING, basically jetpack is meant to freeze you next to criminals, why you don't want it in ARs as well ?why you guys don't support this while you actually get frozen next to other wanted criminals ? bullshit to keep your advantage huh ?, you're really funny guys, look at yourself, creating any excuse to vote negative.Also, if criminals are cracking ARs then cops are sleeping or patrolling in other places, it's not our problem that you kill the guys robbing stores instead of clearing ARs/CEs first, proofs can be sent in 1-3 days "if wanted"
Yes,outside AR it would be abuse because your defenses might be down or cops come from nowhere, but in AR its way different story, I say its mostly used in LSA-S, if you for example can't shoot someone flying through a huge door from long way then its definitely your problem, or the campers problems, and about the AR thing I won't even bother replying to this illogical statement "it's not our problem that you kill the guys robbing stores instead of clearing ARs/CEs first" because this is not even relevant to what I said .
This post looks funny to me as a cop where a criminal can already lurk up behind at any time not only in ARs (which is very common btw) but any place and anytime at all. So it's not really an unfair advantage. I wonder when you will consider shooting a criminal an unfair advantage too... Not to mention you already get frozen for landing near a wanted player. Pretty unnecessary suggestion, I vote negative.
My vote gonna be Negative, because if a cop was using a jetpack and went near a criminal, and he removed it and freezed, the criminal gonna get advantage to damage the cop and maybe killing him while the cop is frozen, and that's very unfair, and i'm assure for you that many cops will hate the game.In the close ARs like GY, GT( inside te building), CC, RB, MO, IS(Inside the building), and BB no one can come from behind of you and killing you. The other ARs are open, yes, but when alot of criminals in 1 AR, just a few cops will use jetpack and attack from behind, but some criminals will catch him and killing him before that cop kill any criminal.
Biased posts are forbidden when accusing the suggestion to harm "my side" over failure in explaining the reasons for so will result in a warning. For encouraging hatred between the two sides by mixing your opinion in the post and going off-topic instead of being a fair person. You still can give examples of other subjects by going off-topic BUT, you should explain it well in a way it attaches the current idea of the topic. If you fail so, you will be warned for a biased post. Think fairly before posting.