CIT Forum Index
Ingame Community => News and Updates => Topic started by: Mayrou on 10 01, 2022, 07:15:07 pm
-
Hello, this is the 2nd part of my Suggestion (https://cit.gg/index.php?topic=381495.0)
Houses are not like before, they have really changed, it's super hard to own a house unless you have alot of money.
I know somebody who owns a total of +70 houses, of course he's rich, he can own everything, why wouldn't him give a chance for players to own a couple of houses? Unless he's a greedy ass.
Proof by 9R: Show content
https://prnt.sc/26bdnbu
That's why houses slots should be limited to 5 per account
VIP Level 3 will give you the ability to own 5 houses already, plus the 5 houses slots, you can own a total of 10 houses, I think that's fair enough.
When I suggested adding house slots, my suggestion was clear that you should limit the slots per person, for example 5 as you say, and they get more and more expensive the more you buy, but somehow they weren't limited
But I totally agree with you that house slots should be limited to 10 per account.
I already suggested it back then, I don't know why arran didn't limit the slots, it's a shame.
-
Voting Positive, I agree with you, it will definitely be fairer...
-
As I agreed with your first suggestion I am also supporting your second suggestion. Houses should be available to everyone. And limiting houses to 5 per account will be fair. I am voting Positive :tick:
-
There should be a limit to buying houses becaouse you can own an endless number of the houses. :tick:
-
Limitations is always a good thing to maintain the balance and bring fairness to everyone, whether he's dl or not.
:tick:
-
I have to ask myself, why does anybody need 70 houses? If anything, there should be more money sinks / ways to use ridiculous ammounts of cash IG rather than monopolizing houses etc. This goes for anything, no one person, in my opinion should own more than X ammount of things. Vehicles for eg is different as vehicles are magically produced for your F2 Veh Inventory.
So :tick: unless someone has a counter argument.
-
I was about to suggest that but something stopped me which is those people who have +10 houses what will happen to their houses will they go to the Server? okay but what about the money they paid for the Slots and Houses? I am positive anyway but answer my questions to make the Suggestion clear for everyone
-
Limiting players to buy multiple houses is a good way, And as far as I know players buy House slot above F7 for 10 million for 1 slot. so this ability makes it impossible for other players to buy a house in a certain location while the owner has too many houses in LS like the example on the image you provided. so each account at least 5+ house slot is a good thing limit them. and leave the other houses for the player to have a chance to buy them. :tick: :cringe:
-
I was about to suggest that but something stopped me which is those people who have +10 houses what will happen to their houses will they go to the Server? okay but what about the money they paid for the Slots and Houses? I am positive anyway but answer my questions to make the Suggestion clear for everyone
I did not say that houses should be taken from them, we still can save the 30% houses of LS.
It would be unfair for them if we remove their houses now.
There's an AI Trader that could buy the houses slots, they can be sold to other players too.
-
Oh yeah.
They way it should have been ever since day one.
Supported :tick:
Those that spent billions on houses simply speculated more than they should have on a still very new system so they willingly took a risk.
I was about to suggest that but something stopped me which is those people who have +10 houses what will happen to their houses will they go to the Server?
I don't empathize with people that deprived players from buying houses for a fair price just so they could profit. Real estate speculation is always a scummy attitude.
I personally hope they lose their billions but some (not full) refunds could be issued on a case by case basis.
-
Just back to the old system, per DLx more Houses.
No DL = 1 house
DL1 = 2 houses
DL2 = 3 Houses
DL3 = 4 Houses
-
okay but what about the money they paid for the Slots and Houses?
Probably a refund
I absolutely support this suggestion, if someone owns 70 houses, that's really not okay. :tick:
-
Well I totally agree and as madaus said.
Just back to the old system, per DLx more Houses.
No DL = 1 house
DL1 = 2 houses
DL2 = 3 Houses
DL3 = 4 Houses
This is the best method. Supporting :tick:
-
If this update is added, will people with 50 houses have their house removed? what will happen to them?
-
after reading this suggestion and as one of the players that holds +75 houses I'm saying that It's not our fault the administration decided to liberalize the real estate market, we saw a chance to start a business and we took it in a legal way there wasn't any rule says you should not hold more then 70 houses. in fact I was going to suggest the same thing you suggesting when I came from inactivity and I found people owning most of ls but I decided to not do that because what could the administration do they cant just remove there houses its not fair that would destroy credibility of this server for good, the houses system is one of the important things in this server and the way this system going is really fkt up the houses prices inflation going crazy because of the competition who will get the most houses in ls . so I will suggest some real solution to fix this from houses owners prospective : make a limit for houses 10 houses . the other houses should be bought randomly by the server for the same price they bought it for not for the prices they are selling for so the profits 0 and loses 0(in this suggestion I'm sure most of houses owners wouldn't agree with me cuz they will lose too much )
,make a houses limit but without touching the houses that means you have 70 house you cant buy more and if you sold one you will have 69 and the number will keep dropping when you sell the houses until you reach the limit . or keep the new system after all our cash isn't unlimited
-
the other houses should be bought randomly by the server for the same price they bought it for not for the prices they are selling for so the profits 0 and loses 0(in this suggestion im sure most of houses owners wouldnt agree with me cuz they will lose too much )
You're aware that this would still print money out of thin air, no?
X bought the house from Y and paid $100,000,000
what you're asking is that X get's $100,000,000 as a refund for the house lost, which means an extra $100,000,000 will be printed into the server.
So no.
-
You're aware that this would still print money out of thin air, no?
X bought the house from Y and paid $100,000,000
what you're asking is that X get's $100,000,000 as a refund for the house lost, which means an extra $100,000,000 will be printed into the server.
So no.
yes I know about this it will cause an inflation. ingame cash will lose some of its value but it will be temporary and its important step how do you think we will refund this players who bought this houses in a legal way by apologizing to them *you guys lost your houses hardluck for you * things doesn't work like this we all should take responsibilities for this new system since we voted for it . I myself spent +2.5b on houses+slots so I wouldn't expect getting less then what I paid for this houses ,for me I would love to keep this system but for the server I'm ready to be reasonable as I know this system is corrupt and I have no hands in that I'm not the one who suggested it but I'm ready to get away with the smallest loses by getting what I paid for this houses I'm not speaking on behalf of the others they can reply telling us there opinions it will be helpful
-
Marked as Top priority for a faster response. 70 houses owned by 1 person is too much, isn't it? ｢(ﾟﾍﾟ)
-
Marked as Top priority for a faster response. 70 houses owned by 1 person is too much, isn't it? ｢(ﾟﾍﾟ)
Yes its to much, but if some re-trade is made with the houses, this can be interesting and perhaps useful for both the server and the players.
Many unsold houses can still be seen on the server. But for each house a maximum limit must be set for how much it can be sold. So that some players do not set too high house prices (for example 300m + for some crappy house). So I believe that people will try re-trades here, and that's something new, I think it will make the game more interesting, at least for a while, because this idea won't last very long, at least that's my opinion.
-
How do you plan on making it fair for the house owners? This suggestion is missing an essential part which could just ruin many players gameplay
-
How do you plan on making it fair for the house owners? This suggestion is missing an essential part which could just ruin many players gameplay
I did not say that their houses should be removed, only slots will be limited from now on. They'll not be able to buy another house unless they have -10 houses (as DL3)
-
I did not say that their houses should be removed, only slots will be limited from now on. They'll not be able to buy another house unless they have -10 houses (as DL3)
Then basically this doesn't change anything as they'll still be holding all their houses
-
I did not say that their houses should be removed, only slots will be limited from now on. They'll not be able to buy another house unless they have -10 houses (as DL3)
sorry but I thought their houses will be sold but mate this fixed nothing I would like to change my Vote to negative.
-
Then basically this doesn't change anything as they'll still be holding all their houses
Nope, this suggestion will stop them from takingover. There's no way to take their houses from them as it would be unfair for them if we do so.
-
Just back to the old system, per DLx more Houses.
No DL = 1 house
DL1 = 2 houses
DL2 = 3 Houses
DL3 = 4 Houses
you are wrong bro
DL0 = 2 Houses
DL1 = 3 Houses
DL2 = 4 Houses
DL3 = 5 Houses
anyway I agree with you
:tick:
-
Then basically this doesn't change anything as they'll still be holding all their houses
This.
you are wrong bro
DL0 = 2 Houses
DL1 = 3 Houses
DL2 = 4 Houses
DL3 = 5 Houses
anyway I agree with you
:tick:
And this?? What about people who have 6 houses with 3 VIP levels?
I thought of an idea which should work for 10+ houses owned, that house owners have an option for them to choose which house's price will decrease day after day, otherwise the server will automatically chose the cheapest one, indeed with a logical percentage, so this will let them only hold the preferred X amount of houses rather than owning whole LS.
Furthermore, this will give a chance for other players to buy those houses, and the houses trading might be refreshed as house owners should sell their undesirable ones rapidly before losing more profit. In addition, the selected house would diminish by price until it reaches the initial one, and if it reached it will be automatically sold for the server.
Plus, the same "account" can't buy the same house for 7 days in order to not buy it again immediately. If you think this idea would be exploitable somehow (Letting a friend buy it, and the owner re-buy it again after 7 days), my answer is NO, because buying more houses would be prohibited and house slots should be restricted to 5 for everyone and for those who own more than 10 houses.
This is what came in mind. If this was ever implemented by any chance, then it will take a bit too long to adjust the issue, but please aim to give it a try.
-
@Mayrou I agree with your suggestion, but there is one problem: what you can do with owners which they have already 100+ houses in one account, how you can fix this? Suggest to pay more taxes if you own more houses or how you can fix this limit for them? Think you on this, how you will fix for everyone to hve this limit ｢(ﾟﾍﾟ)
POSITIVE
-
- Can't buy house slots if already own 5. (Arran + Mayrou)