I doubt anyone will bother adding another way to get drugs when they're clearly saturating the game.Everyone thinks a suggestion is good until they are asked to script it. Arran checks this board regularly and if those topics didn't catch his attention then they'll never be added.Just saying.
If you don't agree with the current system. Find a better one that is actually possible to implement.
Have you considered hiring someone to do that? Someone who knows and has a special rank for it. Maybe there is someone who likes to do scripts.
Ik it, also about my suggestion I think there are already old scripts, if they are saved, because this is a suggestion to return something old to the server, but it can be improved, of course.Have you considered hiring someone to do that? Someone who knows and has a special rank for it. Maybe there is someone who likes to do scripts.I believe that he is checking everything, but maybe that's exactly what he left for us to solve. He is one, and ours is 1000, I don't think he can achieve everything himself, that's why he has ours, that's why we are here, if we can make an agreement, a change, because there are a lot of dissatisfied people who even gave up.I believe that there are still a lot of people who have great ideas but do not want to waste time, because they think that their topic will only be locked and as if it did not even exist, without any explanation, and despite that he had 8+ positive votes without negative ones. I'm not the first one to have this happen to her. So let's try to solve that.Edit:Let's say we hear other opinions, I don't want to bring any systems myself. We'll all do it together
Gave up because we don't listen to rants and don't spend 48 hours a day scripting whines? The offer is still there: https://cit.gg/index.php?board=974.0 instead of spending time creating rules, changing rules, ranting in general, spend time making the script you want. You don't even need CIT-related scripting exports to make a working script.
You need to state the reason why you're voting positive or negative
Voting
Please add or if you're voting.
What if they need to ask a question or debate over it before casting their vote, they might need more info before deciding? I've done this before and so have others, I don't think it's a "useless" post to request more info from topic starter. If after their question / doubts have been answered they still haven't voted in a particular way, just don't count their vote? (Not like they have), but I don't think it needs to be ... deleted?
If we're going to enforce this, great, but if Staff are excluded from this "rule" then I don't think it's fair
what if there's nothing else to add when casting your vote, what if everyone has already made all the possible points?
What if they need to ask a question or debate over it before casting their vote, they might need more info before deciding?