Positive,
30 minutes is a lot and true some civilians are very good so maybe we can make like a ramp up limit? for example if you win a SO event you'll be limited for 10 minutes and then if you win another even in the span of an hour or 2 (numbers can be changed) it will be 20 minutes and then 30 minutes and keeps being 30 minutes if you keep winning events.
Positive,I'm also supporting this idea its really cool, the more you win events more cooldown you received and this called fair play
30 minutes is a lot and true some civilians are very good so maybe we can make like a ramp up limit? for example if you win a SO event you'll be limited for 10 minutes and then if you win another even in the span of an hour or 2 (numbers can be changed) it will be 20 minutes and then 30 minutes and keeps being 30 minutes if you keep winning events.
Hello Community!
as everyone know when you win any State Official event you cannot participate again only after 30minShow content(https://imgur.com/PIh2ndz.png). 30min is too much :ree:
my suggestion is very simple my suggestion is reducing the events limit from 30min to 10min.
I don't see why there is a limit in the first place. A State Official should have enough common sense to assess a suitable cooldown period between events.
Well, do you have any supporting statistics, like the average number of State Official events hosted in an hour, or maybe drilled down to the 30-minute span in question?
I'm sure a feature has to account for all types of people and their behavior, it would incite chaos if everyone is assumed to have common sense!
If no statistics will back me up, I'll propose a happy scenario; I'm gonna assume that the average player takes ~1 minute to reach the event's destination. After that ~2 minutes to complete the event's objective(s) and win. If a State Official immediately decides to host another event, give them a modest ~2-minute window of finding another location/setup for the new event, that is if they're really determined and focused on hosting a bunch of SO events. (If there are any sorts of cooldowns on SO events, please let me know!) If State Officials keep on on this for about an hour, you have ~10 SO events hosted in that hour, which gives skilled civilians only 2 chances of winning in these events. Reducing the win cooldown to 10 minutes would potentially make them win half of these events by themselves.
Now after that [theoretical] statistical assumption, I'm really starting to think the state officials should be the ones getting a cooldown, not the civilians! If we apply the 10-minute cooldown on SOs rather than civilians, there'd be ~5 events hosted per hour, if a civilian wins every event they attend, they're gonna win 2/5 of them.
Of course, this won't always be the case, it's an assumption on a happy scenario, but since the suggestion was almost surely inspired by the same happy scenario, let's battle them out together!
I'm not a nerd, it's just that numbers and statistical insights are really important, y'all D:
I’m fairly sure that this suggestion was based off of the event type “SO chase”. In that case, saying that it is winnable within 3 minutes is a very very optimistic assumption. Of course it isn’t impossible, but it generally takes quite a bit longer than that. Sometimes no one at all wins it because the SO was able to outrun them all so that part of your argument is slightly flawed. Also, while SO’s don’t officially have a cooldown to host events, we do have a bank system in place and if that bank becomes empty, which happens relatively fast depending on the prizes that we put, we are also not able to host any events anymore, effectively limiting us until the limit resets. So there technically already is a system in place which limits SO’s a bit. Forcing SO’s to have a 10 minute time limit in between events would be a bad idea in my opinion, cause it can kill the enthusiasm of participants very quickly if they have to wait 10 minutes after each event was hosted.
Now to the actual suggestion itself, I honestly don’t think it’s necessary to decrease the limit. It was added in the first place to give other people a chance of winning the events so it’s not always the same one person winning and this can keep the motivation of other players up. Maybe 30 minutes is too long, I’m not sure, but 10 minutes is definitely too short, considering often times a chase can take up to 10 minutes already. If the limit is going to be lowered, it should be lowered at most to 20 minutes, any less than that and it becomes a bit useless in my opinion. For now though, since the suggestion is to 10 minutes, I will vote negative
I’m fairly sure that this suggestion was based off of the event type “SO chase”. In that case, saying that it is winnable within 3 minutes is a very very optimistic assumption. Of course it isn’t impossible, but it generally takes quite a bit longer than that. Sometimes no one at all wins it because the SO was able to outrun them all so that part of your argument is slightly flawed. Also, while SO’s don’t officially have a cooldown to host events, we do have a bank system in place and if that bank becomes empty, which happens relatively fast depending on the prizes that we put, we are also not able to host any events anymore, effectively limiting us until the limit resets. So there technically already is a system in place which limits SO’s a bit. Forcing SO’s to have a 10 minute time limit in between events would be a bad idea in my opinion, cause it can kill the enthusiasm of participants very quickly if they have to wait 10 minutes after each event was hosted.10 minutes in a game is still very long, I am mostly sure that an event takes 5 minutes at max, anymore than that happens very rarely. Plus, 10 minutes is very reasonable for keeping it a competition because why would you want to suspend the person that won just so you can give other people a chance like why can't they just try to win while he's there ?
Now to the actual suggestion itself, I honestly don’t think it’s necessary to decrease the limit. It was added in the first place to give other people a chance of winning the events so it’s not always the same one person winning and this can keep the motivation of other players up. Maybe 30 minutes is too long, I’m not sure, but 10 minutes is definitely too short, considering often times a chase can take up to 10 minutes already. If the limit is going to be lowered, it should be lowered at most to 20 minutes, any less than that and it becomes a bit useless in my opinion. For now though, since the suggestion is to 10 minutes, I will vote negative
I agree with it , 10 min will be better@Traxxy Your own reason is needed when voting, or it'll be considered as a useless post, and removed.
10 minutes in a game is still very long, I am mostly sure that an event takes 5 minutes at max, anymore than that happens very rarely. Plus, 10 minutes is very reasonable for keeping it a competition because why would you want to suspend the person that won just so you can give other people a chance like why can't they just try to win while he's there ?10 minutes really isnt that long. Depending on the SO and the event type, an event can definitely last longer than 5 minutes, it is not that rare.
SO events don't really have a skill gap for the limit to be THIS long so I pretty much support it being 10 mins.
10 minutes really isnt that long. Depending on the SO and the event type, an event can definitely last longer than 5 minutes, it is not that rare.It's very boring when you won an event and wait 30min to participate again
And as I've said before, the limit is mainly there to motivate other people so it's not always the same person winning. It might be unintuitive that a limit can motivate people
If you have no experience, don't vote. (https://cdn.discordapp.com/emojis/613463705430261775.png?size=48)as everyone know SOs can do events and if you win an event you can not participate again only after 30min, simply my suggestion is reducing it to 10min it dont need to experience. :kek2:
If you have no experience, don't vote. (https://cdn.discordapp.com/emojis/613463705430261775.png?size=48)
Someone who knows how events work and how only the good individuals like Gebeng, Mlem, Ixi, Isdej, Roukas will win events.Yes that's right those players who always win SO events because I dont see anyone except them even trying to win an event :kek4:
Why did u see anyone before complains when someone always wins CEM events ?
I hope this gets accepted to see you all struggle and complain how you can't win an event because the good players have no limit.
You can see a key SO with years of experience and a honourable SO with even more experience than all of you combined vote negative knowing well it's not going to end well
Positive,
30 minutes is a lot and true some civilians are very good so maybe we can make like a ramp up limit? for example if you win a SO event you'll be limited for 10 minutes and then if you win another even in the span of an hour or 2 (numbers can be changed) it will be 20 minutes and then 30 minutes and keeps being 30 minutes if you keep winning events.
Someone who knows how events work and how only the good individuals like Gebeng, Mlem, Ixi, Isdej, Roukas will win events. You even admitted that you don't play as a civilian so how are you supposed to know what's the case in these events?