You're telling the truth. They take criminal job. They fly to the roofs with jetpacks and take gangster job again. But when they do this, they wait for 8 seconds. So I think your suggestion is illogical. Because there is already a waiting time of 8 seconds. It will be better if we make it 15 or 30.let me mention that this restriction will only work if they used jetpack, if they didn't it wont be applied to them so I think 3 min is good to avoid any misuse because if you were a gangster and u gonna wait 15sec only to be able to shoot you will still do it.
let me mention that this restriction will only work if they used jetpack, if they didn't it wont be applied to them so I think 3 min is good to avoid any misuse because if you were a gangster and u gonna wait 15sec only to be able to shoot you will still do it.If I think about it from this point of view, I have to say that you are right. I vote positively.
There's already a restriction for 10 sec after going gangster, this will let the target escape anyways, right?
3 minutes is too brutal with the inclusion of the already occuring restriction. Besides there are instances where its unintentional to use jetpack and need to be gangster at the same time.it's 8 seconds but still, people abuse this feature, so I think adding a restriction for people who go criminal to take jetpack then take gang jobs back would be good.
My vote would be NEGATIVE :cros:
This restriction will only be applied if u used jetpack as criminal then tried to go gangIf it will be applied ONLY if you used the jetpack as a Criminal, then moved to be a Gangster, it will be fine for me, but 5 min will be too much, I see adding it for 1 min would be more than enough. Positive.
Negetive , they'll just abuse it by cracking at the proof of turf or something like this . For far play it been removed . :cros:lol, what are u saying, I suggested this to stop them from abusing this feature.
I'd just change my vote if u add a block like police when he use jetpack ( freez time ) .
lol, what are u saying, I suggested this to stop them from abusing this feature.Change my vote to possitive then .Show contentre-read the suggestion
This isn't abusable as you've the ability to take cover. Hence, rather than complaining and wasting developers team for something that disturbs you, what about protecting yourself somewhere and let the player who's on the roof to come down to you? Fair enough.Do you know that this is already punishable? I am here suggesting this to avoid people from getting punishments that's all, plus if jetpacks were removed from gangsters for a reason why are they trying to use it by abusing it?
You don't have to rush about voting positive just because you feel disturbed, but playing while there're restrictions is nothing but a devastation of the gameplay.
Therefore, I'm not in support of this proposal because of the reasons stated above.
This clearly an abuse. I need to know if we can get turf at the high point, if yes then this is needs to be fixed.no, you can't turf at any high point.
Top priority: Suggestions that are not about feature additions, it could be a bug but it's not a bug to be reported at QA board. Suggestions that are purposed to be fixed to bring balance into the server. More meant to be fixed as it's abusable and could ruin the balance of CnR. These suggestions will be marked as a top priority once it receives enough support, no specific vote counts are required and it'll be up to moderators to decide on it's important to be stickied or not. They will be marked with the [TOP] title.Marked as Top Priority