[++] Limiting the number of satchels thrown by 5 per player.

[daddy]

What is the suggestion going about?: Limiting the number of satchels thrown by 5 per player.
Description: Sometimes players use more than 7 or 10 satchels so it bugs the whole players in the turf who saw the satchels so they cannot use grenades or RPGs anymore.
What would this suggestion improve: This would fix more GTA SA bugs that can be exploited/abused here and even if no one would exploit it some players use more than 7 or even 10 satchels so let's say 3-4 players used 10 satchels no one will be able to use projectiles in the area.
Why does this need to be added?: Fixing more bugs and making the combat system more professional.
Can you provide us any examples?: GTA 5 has a limit that players can't have more than 5 active sticky bombs, and here is a video of how the bug works.

Show content

[Maximo]

Imo, this suggestion must be implemented due to the fact that using high amount of satchel will cause bug as mentioned in the suggestion. Furthermore, it's also good for the sake of LV players since I my self when play in LV it really bother me to see people ruining the fight inside a turf with planting tons of satchels. I am voting positive on this 

[CJGIANNHS]

It's a good idea to avoid this bugs at lv.
 

[InVerSioN]

This will let our gameplay more fun because sometimes I get that bug and the only solution is satchels getting detonated which can be controlled by a troller.

[Han'Lue]

Voting Positive, Firstly, thank you for expressing your whole opinion in a transparent way. I agree with you and to give my own opinion the battles will be more fun in LV because this kind of trollers will be blocked, I mean in a professional war all players have more fun and can increase the number of gangsters in LV.

[Jason]

Voting positive, more than 5 satchels down isn't any more effective and is only being used to abuse this annoying explosive limit where you cant throw nades.

[Cirenaur]

I'm not an LV player, but this will make the wars fairer and more realistic.Every time my friends call/invite me to help them in LV, I don't wanna go just because of the bombs dropped one after the other.whatever I'm gonna positive bra 

[ManeXi]

I am a satchel player. I hate grenades spamming shit so I find my self comfortable with satchels, limiting it to 5 satchels is unfair
Maybe 10 is fine 

[daddy]

I am a satchel player. I hate grenades spamming shit so I find my self comfortable with satchels, limiting it to 5 satchels is unfair
Maybe 10 is fine 

5 will can let you kill player with Full HP + Armor so more than 5 is pretty useless tho

[ManeXi]

5 will can let you kill player with Full HP + Armor so more than 5 is pretty useless tho

Sometimes, In a war you have to place them separately, not in one position
10 is fine again

[daddy]

IDK up to developers but the limit itself is required to avoid the bug.

[ManeXi]

IDK up to developers but the limit itself is required to avoid the bug.

Per example if the limit of throwing satchls is 20, if u throw 19 the rpg/grenade bug won't happen afaik..
thats why I said 10 is fine, making it 5 is just useless and will ruin the satchels again

[daddy]

Per example if the limit of throwing satchls is 20, if u throw 19 the rpg/grenade bug won't happen afaik..
thats why I said 10 is fine, making it 5 is just useless and will ruin the satchels again

Lets say manexi throw 10 satchels and another player in the same turf throw 10 satchels then all the players at the turf will get bugged

[Hallow2]

This is a great idea, it can not be misunderstood for unbalancing one side as it will affect all players, if not, nerfing the fact that we can throw with any restriction  teargas/morotov/satchels as many as we wanted. I'm going positive.

[Bridges]

We've seen players "planting" many satchel stockbombs in places that are one way out so if someone wants to pass through has to detonate the stocked bombs or die there without any way to escape, lowering the max limit of the number of bombs you can plant will bring more balance than disturbance. Positive.